www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Links  |  Webmaster 
Updated Sun, August 15, 2010.
151.www.meteoclimatic.com2120000
152.www.astrored.org2090000
153.www.gsmworld.com2080000
154.www.ces.ncsu.edu2080000
155.www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de2080000
156.www.jaxa.jp1990000
157.www.whyville.net1980000
158.www.vdi-nachrichten.com1980000
159.arxiv.org1970000
160.www.lelectronique.com1970000
161.www.cnshb.ru1970000
162.www.the-scientist.com1930000
163.www.futura-sciences.com1930000
164.www.meteored.com1920000
165.www.unu.edu1910000
166.www.mta.hu1900000
167.www.space.com1890000
168.www.vdi.de1870000
169.www.informatik.rwth-aachen.de1860000
170.www.sciencepresse.qc.ca1810000
171.www.dwd.de1810000
172.www.mygeo.info1800000
173.www.webelements.com1780000
174.www.forskning.no1770000
175.www.biodic.go.jp1760000
176.www.wolfram.com1750000
177.www.inauka.ru1750000
178.www.akihabaranews.com1740000
179.www.mcmaster.com1730000
180.www.genome.ad.jp1730000
181.www.lirmm.fr1730000
182.www.fszek.hu1720000
183.www.leica-geosystems.com1710000
184.www.extension.umn.edu1700000
185.nationalzoo.si.edu1680000
186.www.agrisalon.com1680000
187.www.spaceweather.com1670000
188.www.randi.org1670000
189.www.jlab.org1650000
190.www.molecularlab.it1640000
191.www.dfg.de1630000
192.www.sgs.com1620000
193.www.cdc.gov1610000
194.www.geologi.it1610000
195.www.psiconline.it1610000
196.www.mumm.ac.be1610000
197.www.jogiforum.hu1590000
198.www.wissenschaft.de1570000
199.www.astroarts.co.jp1560000
200.www.bioportal.jp1550000
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Furl Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Ma.gnolia Add to Newsvine Add to Shadows

178. www.akihabaranews.com

Rating: 1740000 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.akihabaranews.com' on the other websites

www.akihabaranews.com

Akihabara News

Most popular searches: www.akihabaranewscom, www.akihabaranews.om, technology, astronomy, genetics, , scientific, science, computers, www.akiabaranews.com, www.aihabaranews.com, cell, ww.akihabaranews.com, www.akihabaanews.com, journal, physics, www.akihabarnews.com, biology, wwwakihabaranews.com, space, mathematics, www.akhabaranews.com, engineering, chemistry, university, www.akihabaranews.cm, environment, www.akihbaranews.com, zoology, www.akihabaranews, www.akihabaraews.com, research, brain, health, botany, scientist, agriculture, www.akihabaranew.com, www.akihabranews.com, medicine, wwwakihabaranews.com, www.akihabaranews.co, www.akihabaranes.com, discovery, www.kihabaranews.com, animals, researcher, www.akihabaranws.com, www.akihaaranews.com, climate, ww.akihabaranews.com

Google

© 2005-2010 www.Top100Science.com
Stem cell scientists share concerns
Some stem cell scientists are worried they might not be able to live up to some of the promises that have been made about their work, new research has found.
abc.net.au
Chicken of the sea? Tuna farming getting a boost
KUMANO, Japan (AP) -- Thousands of tuna, their silver bellies bloated with fat, swim frantically around in netted areas of a small bay, stuffing themselves until they grow twice as heavy as in the wild....
hosted.ap.org
Obama raced clock, chaos, comedy for climate deal
WASHINGTON (AP) -- It was almost unthinkable. The president of the United States walked into a meeting of fellow world leaders and there wasn't a chair for him, a sure sign he was not expected, maybe not even wanted....
hosted.ap.org
Swine flu wasn't overhyped – research meant we had to play it safe
There was no conspiracy or panic. Scientists were right to prepare us for a major crisisSimon Jenkins's distaste for scientists leads him to declare that they deliberately overstate risks, and make panic predictions (Swine flu was as elusive as WMD. The real threat is mad scientist syndrome, 15 January). In reality, scientists worked calmly – not "frantically" as Jenkins asserts – to predict the progress of the disease and to understand risk.Jenkins says of the initial predictions about the spread of swine flu: "The chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, bandied about any figure that came into his head, settling on '65,000 could die', peaking at 350 corpses a day."Worst-case predictions are not figures plucked out the air "to convey plausibility", but result from well-researched computer simulations. Margins of error are high; no one pretends otherwise. Yet Jenkins is delighted when a worst-case scenario isn't met, as though he were right and everyone else wrong.There is a genuine debate which we must not overlook. What should the government response be? Does the risk justify the expense of stockpiling vaccine? Is it right to divert funds away from other health matters? But Jenkins doesn't ask such questions – instead he dismisses it all as "hysteria". Reasonable advice – alerting morgues, identifying vital key workers – is denounced as "drivel".You could argue that media coverage of H1N1 was excessive and that editors think the biggest numbers make the best headlines. But the scientific process has been evidence-based and transparent throughout. At the Science Media Centre we have tried to ensure that responsible journalists have had access to the best scientists. We've seen lots of co-operation and very little hysteria.Science moves by small steps, and as we learn more the picture becomes clearer. This is how official advice on Tamiflu for children was revised. Each time a risk comes along we are better prepared to characterise the next one. But decisions still need to be made early. Picture a beleaguered Simon Jenkins in the middle of a deadly pandemic, decrying the government's woefully inadequate response and failure to order enough vaccine.It's embarrassingly straightforward. Viruses usually don't mutate into major killers; that's why there are still people left on the planet. But it has happened before and will happen again. We can't predict when – that's what risk is – but we can perform the analyses, educate ourselves and be prepared, all underpinned by evidence drawn from virology and epidemiology. Or we could shrug and say it's all hype, and most of the time we'd be right. Similarly, most of the times I put on a seatbelt I don't crash my car.Jenkins's logic goes as follows. Once there was a boy who cried wolf, but there wasn't a wolf. Therefore not only do wolves not exist, but there must be a conspiracy between wolf experts, the lupine risk assessment board and the manufacturers of bite-proof trousers to convince the rest of us that they do.With swine flu there wasn't conspiracy and hype; just scientists, patiently performing the analyses, and explaining the possibilities.Swine fluHealthHealth policyNHSFluHealth & wellbeingFlu pandemicTom Sheldonguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
The Ozone Hole Is Mending. Now for the ‘But.’
The hole in the Earth’s ozone layer is slowly mending, a big victory for environmental policy makers. But a new report says its repair may contribute to global warming.
feeds.nytimes.com