www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Webmaster 
Updated Thu, February 2, 2012.
651.www.hhmi.org44500
652.www.unknowncountry.com44300
653.www.debunker.com44300
654.www.ncsm.city.nagoya.jp44300
655.www.infn.it44200
656.www.pps.jussieu.fr44100
657.www.servicedoc.info43900
658.www.ecoline.ru43900
659.www.galileonet.it43800
660.www.agropolis.fr43700
661.prl.aps.org43600
662.www.cite-sciences.fr43500
663.www.llnl.gov43300
664.www.hochschulkompass.de43200
665.www.ill.fr43200
666.tel.ccsd.cnrs.fr43100
667.www.archaeologie-online.de42500
668.www.cgiar.org42400
669.www.sino.uni-heidelberg.de42400
670.www.cbs.dk42300
671.www.biodiv.org42100
672.www.technovelgy.com42100
673.www.afssa.fr41600
674.www.curie.fr41300
675.www.cimne.upc.es41300
676.quake.wr.usgs.gov41200
677.www.iva.se41200
678.www.dmi.dk41200
679.www.worldweather.org41100
680.www.enea.it40700
681.www.bio.com40700
682.www.ba.infn.it40600
683.www.goes.noaa.gov40500
684.www.sciencepresse.qc.ca40500
685.www.humi.keio.ac.jp40500
686.www.dreammoods.com40100
687.www.gaw.ru40100
688.www.disclaimer.de39900
689.www.magnet.fsu.edu39800
690.www.jsbi.org39800
691.www.astronews.com39700
692.www.reverso.net39600
693.www.pasteur.fr39600
694.www.brgm.fr39600
695.www.sfi.dk39600
696.www.transnationale.org39500
697.www.inm.es39400
698.www.iu.hio.no39400
699.www.nioo.knaw.nl39400
700.www.beyonddiscovery.org39300
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Newsvine

681. www.bio.com

Rating: 40700 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.bio.com' on the other websites

www.bio.com

BIO.COM: Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical News, Jobs, Software, Protocols, Events

Description: BIO.COM provides research news, industry news, technology-focused webcasts, job listings, laboratory protocols, books, software, market research reports, and much more in a freely accessible format. The portal website\'s registered user base exceeds 150,000. It is frequented by over 35,0000 unique users per month, predominantly scientists and business executives.

Google

© 2005-2011 www.Top100Science.com
US grapples with bedbugs, misuse of pesticides
By MATT LEINGANG 2010-08-31T03:40:34ZCOLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- A resurgence of bedbugs across the U.S. has homeowners and apartment dwellers taking desperate measures to eradicate the tenacious bloodsuckers, with some relying on dangerous outdoor pesticides and fly-by-night exterminators....
hosted.ap.org
EPA told gas drilling does, does not taint water
By MARY ESCH 2010-09-13T22:25:44ZBINGHAMTON, N.Y. (AP) -- Rep. Maurice Hinchey told a federal hearing Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency must regulate hydraulic fracturing, the natural gas extraction process that he said has contaminated water near drilling sites around the country....
hosted.ap.org
Health and Safety in Particle Physics II | Jon Butterworth
After Lily's post on poor risk assessment in particle physics, I thought I should bring to your attention the risk of putting your hand in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - as discussed by Ed Copeland and his colleagues at Nottingham UniversityI love this video from the University of Nottingham where physicists try to answer tricky but valid physics questions in real time. Seeing them think, and say they "don't know" sometimes, gives a better feel for research (and teaching) than a bevy of meticulously prepared seminars.The first question is "What would happen if I put my hand in the beam at the Large Hadron Collider". There were a variety of answers, but as far as I can tell my colleague Ed Copeland has most of the facts right.My guess is it would blow a hole and give you radiation sickness. (Answered, like Ed and his colleagues, without preparation). Some other comments: One of the physicists mentions the vacuum, which might be unpleasant. But it is also colder than space in there, which might be more of a problem.Also, although I don't want anyone to do the actual "hand in beam" experiment (it would delay data taking), it would be fairly simple to build a software model of a hand and body and do it virtually. This is how the detectors and beams are designed in the first place - see my article here. Could be a good masters project for someone.Ed has invited me to give a seminar in Nottingham in November. Looks like I'd better be prepared for some tricky questions.And many thanks to my co-blogger for drawing my attention to this video.Jon Butterworthguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Space double: Astronaut twins to join up in orbit
By MARCIA DUNN 2010-10-10T03:35:47ZCAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) -- The stars may have finally aligned for the world's only space sibling team....
hosted.ap.org
Scientists confirm water from lunar probe
A head-on collision by a NASA spacecraft last year has confirmed the presence of ice and other frozen compounds on the surface of the moon, according to scientists.
abc.net.au