www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Webmaster 
Updated Thu, February 2, 2012.
1101.www.vs-c.de8510
1102.www.meteonetwork.it8510
1103.www.ev.se8490
1104.www.hush.se8480
1105.www.geography4kids.com8400
1106.www.yardeni.com8120
1107.www.skepticnews.com8080
1108.www.science.nasa.gov8070
1109.oami.eu.int8070
1110.www.voyager3.com8040
1111.www.enc.sorbonne.fr8000
1112.www.dicar.dk7970
1113.www.sociologia.uniroma1.it7930
1114.deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov7900
1115.www.kzs.hu7880
1116.www.fsoc.uba.ar7830
1117.amontenegro.blogspot.com7830
1118.www.certec.lth.se7710
1119.energy.typepad.com7700
1120.archeonet.nl7620
1121.www.earthsky.com7580
1122.www.ebsi.umontreal.ca7540
1123.www.artint.ru7520
1124.www.chem.umu.se7420
1125.www.egyptos.net7400
1126.www.lesbaleines.net7380
1127.www.e-technik.uni-ulm.de7350
1128.www.fis.uniroma3.it7350
1129.www.itc.cnr.it7270
1130.www.date.hu7170
1131.www.geologia.com7140
1132.www.inalf.fr7110
1133.www.frascati.enea.it7040
1134.www.uai.it7030
1135.www.sund.ku.dk7010
1136.www.ing.univaq.it6910
1137.www.bi.ku.dk6890
1138.www.matematicas.net6850
1139.www.tnw.utwente.nl6830
1140.rastosdeluz.astronomo-amador.com6820
1141.www.irta.es6790
1142.www.esrf.fr6740
1143.www.its.se6720
1144.www.cybersciences.com6710
1145.www.kemsu.ru6640
1146.pirulocosmico.blogspot.com6610
1147.www.globexplorer.com6570
1148.www.imaginascience.com6520
1149.www.deutschakademie.com6510
1150.www.bkae.hu6450
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Newsvine

1116. www.fsoc.uba.ar

Rating: 7830 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.fsoc.uba.ar' on the other websites

www.fsoc.uba.ar

Facultad de Ciencias Sociales - UBA - Noticias

Description: Sitio web de la Facultdad de Ciencias Sociales :: UBA :: Información institucional sobre la facultad que agrupa las carreras de Ciencias de la Comunicación, Ciencia Política, Relaciones del Trabajo, Sociología y Trabajo Social. Además se informa sobre posgrados, investigación, extensión universitaria y los contenidos de la biblioteca.

Google

© 2005-2011 www.Top100Science.com
Vital Signs: Childhood: Athletes’ Concussions Have Doubled
The number doubled over a recent 10-year-period, a new study reports, even though participation in team sports decreased slightly.
feeds.nytimes.com
Who now believes that university risks giving women a moustache? | Claire Jones
When women demand equal access to traditionally male roles, theories about their 'natural' unsuitability tend to emergeDr Cordelia Fine's new book, Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society and Neurosexism Create Difference, argues against the idea that male and female brains are programmed by nature to provide contrasting talents and skills. Fine's conclusions provide a timely warning against taking too seriously the deluge of books and articles that would have us believe that men are biologically advantaged when it comes to mathematics, racing driving or map reading – and that women are naturally more intuitive and nurturing, so better at childcare and multitasking (they can look after a child and clean at the same time). No marks for guessing that "masculine" skills tend to be the ones with status in our particular society.Gender difference is a thorny issue and historians would be unwise to enter where even some scientists fear to tread. But leaving the merits of scientific evidence aside, history shows that whenever women start to demand equal access to what have traditionally been men's roles, theories about their "natural" unsuitability tend to emerge.Recently this has ranged from women not being "tough" enough to present Radio 4's Today programme (according to Ceri Thomas, the programme's editor, in March) to reservations about women lacking the necessary competitiveness for the "red in tooth and claw" worlds of the boardroom or top-flight politics. At a time when women are still challenging the glass ceiling while facing an equality backlash, the popularity of science indicating biological brain differences between the sexes – and from that concluding that women simply can't cut it – comes as little surprise.Despite its claim to objectivity, science cannot be immune to the anxieties of its day, influenced as it must be by the society within which it is produced. Our fascination with gender difference as resulting from nature rather than nurture was just as strong at the end of the 19th century. That was when the first-wave women's movement began to raise its voice, demanding access to higher education, the professions and the vote. Women's pleas were met with disdain by many scientific and medical men who provided evidence to "prove" that giving in to women's demands was not only a bad idea, but a harmful one, too.Influenced by Darwin, cutting-edge science pointed to a woman's smaller, less-developed brain and asked if she could be safely trusted with the vote? Women's subjectivity to her emotions, ordained by her evolution, was yet another question mark over her judgement. And as to higher education, a woman's inability to cope with the intense "brain work", which came naturally to men, was simply a matter of "fact". Eminent doctors such as Sir Henry Maudsley warned that women would have nervous breakdowns if pushed too far, and were placing themselves in danger of becoming "masculinised" and infertile. There were calls for protective legislation to be introduced for women of the middle classes attending college, analogous to acts that protected women and children working in the mines.As women made some gains, so a small chorus of dissent grew louder. In their book, The Evolution of Sex, biologist Patrick Geddes and J Arthur Thompson lobbied against higher education and a broader social role for women as "what was decided amongst prehistoric protozoa cannot be annulled by an act of parliament".The social scientist Herbert Spencer, one of the most influential thinkers of his day, argued that female evolution had stopped "at a stage before man's to preserve vital organs for reproduction". If a woman expended energy on intellectual pursuits, energy would be diverted from her reproductive system and she would become sterile. Because of this "any extensive change in the education of women, with a view to fitting them for business and professions, would be mischievous".This type of thinking was not new, but the scientific language that cloaked it was. Ideas about sexual difference, specifically women's inferiority to the male benchmark, go back as far as Aristotle and Plato, with the issue waxing and waning since then. In the 19th century, as now, the debate raged. There were fears about women abandoning domesticity to take on "men's roles" and talk of a "crisis in masculinity" as men no longer knew what they were for. Sound familiar?Science has proved itself a useful tool in the struggle against change and social issues can easily transmute into "unassailable scientific fact" rather than opinion. Theories that university-educated women may acquire moustaches and the inability to have babies may be discredited now, but I wonder how today's science will look in 100 years' time?GenderNeuroscienceWomenClaire Jonesguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Florida panthers bound back thanks to Texas mates
By LAURAN NEERGAARD 2010-09-23T19:34:37ZWASHINGTON (AP) -- In the quest to save the endangered Florida panther, their Texas cousins were the cat's meow. Wildlife biologists moved eight female panthers from Texas - close relatives yet genetically distinct - into south Florida 15 years ago in hopes of boosting reproduction, and the immigration paid off....
hosted.ap.org
EU experts to tackle toxic sludge
EU experts are to begin work in Hungary to assess the toxic sludge spill as officials try to lessen the impact of an "inevitable" new reservoir collapse.
bbc.co.uk
Lung taste receptors may improve asthma treatment
By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID 2010-10-24T17:06:18ZWASHINGTON (AP) -- The ability to taste isn't limited to the mouth, and researchers say that discovery might one day lead to better treatments for diseases such as asthma....
hosted.ap.org