www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Links  |  Webmaster 
Updated Sun, August 15, 2010.
1.photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov158000000
2.www.slac.stanford.edu39900000
3.www.timeanddate.com33600000
4.www.unilang.org31100000
5.www.uni-protokolle.de30900000
6.www.competence-site.de28300000
7.www.cnes.fr28200000
8.www.physorg.com28100000
9.www.freepatentsonline.com26900000
10.www.research.att.com26500000
11.www.abcelectronique.com24500000
12.news.com.com24300000
13.www.electrik.org24200000
14.www.nkj.ru23600000
15.www.biopix.dk21900000
16.www.sciencedirect.com21800000
17.www.audioasylum.com21400000
18.www.newscientist.com19600000
19.www.goethe.de19400000
20.www.nature.com18700000
21.www.chemieonline.de18200000
22.www.buscagro.com17800000
23.www.scirus.com15800000
24.www.br.fgov.be15800000
25.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov15100000
26.www.redensarten-index.de14100000
27.www.forskningsradet.no13700000
28.www.dofbasen.dk13600000
29.www.grin.com12900000
30.www.cnrs.fr12000000
31.www.canoo.net11800000
32.www.archaeologie-online.de11700000
33.www.popsci.com11300000
34.www.livescience.com11100000
35.www.springerlink.com11100000
36.www.inrp.fr11100000
37.www.123recht.net10900000
38.www.geo.de10600000
39.www.absoluteastronomy.com10400000
40.www.chemie.de10100000
41.www.perseus.tufts.edu10000000
42.www.aist.go.jp9980000
43.www.biology-online.org9850000
44.www.eng-tips.com9500000
45.www.heavens-above.com9350000
46.www.allmystery.de9270000
47.www.wissenschaft-online.de9210000
48.www.hausarbeiten.de8880000
49.www.shom.fr8460000
50.news.nationalgeographic.com8410000
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Furl Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Ma.gnolia Add to Newsvine Add to Shadows

33. www.popsci.com

Rating: 11300000 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.popsci.com' on the other websites

www.popsci.com

Home Page - Popular Science

Description: Monthly magazine about current science and technology.

Most popular searches: ww.popsci.com, scientist, medicine, engineering, discovery, www.opsci.com, journal, computers, science, wwwpopsci.com, scientific, mathematics, www.posci.com, www.popscicom, brain, www.popci.com, www.popsci.cm, www.popsci.ocm, chemistry, ww.popsci.com, space, wwwp.opsci.com, cell, www.oppsci.com, www.popsc.icom, university, www.popsci.om, www.popcsi.com, physics, www.pposci.com, zoology, technology, www.popscic.om, www.ppsci.com, animals, researcher, www.popsc.com, www.popsci.com, climate, research, astronomy, www.popsic.com, ww.wpopsci.com, environment, wwwpopsci.com, www.popsci.cmo, biology, agriculture, www.popsi.com, botany, health, www.pospci.com, www.popsci.co, genetics, www.popsci

Google

© 2005-2010 www.Top100Science.com
Viagra: The profitable pill
When Pfizer launched Viagra in 1998 its share price doubled within days. Since then, the little blue pills have become a pillar of profit, earning the company more than £1bn a year.Thanks to promotional campaigns, which included appearances by the footballing legend Pele, male impotence lost some of its stigma and 25 million men requested the pills. In England alone, GPs write about 6m Viagra prescriptions a year.The drug started life in a lab in Sandwich, Kent, where it was developed to treat high blood pressure. Its transformation into a blockbuster treatment for impotence began when volunteers in a clinical trial reported a suspicious number of erections. The overnight success of Viagra prompted Pfizer to wonder if the drug had any effect in women. They raised awareness of a condition called "female sexual arousal disorder", an all-encompassing phrase for sexual dysfunction, and began clinical trials. The trials were a failure and the attempt to have Viagra licensed for the condition was abandoned.Pfizer has been criticised for overstating the benefits of Viagra. It claims "more than half of all men over 40 have some difficulty getting and maintaining an erection". In 2004, the US Food and Drug Administration forced Pfizer to pull a series of advertisements because it made unsubstantiated claims about the drug's effectiveness.Some psychologists warn Viagra has become a lifestyle drug that encourages people to neglect underlying mental or physiological problems that can cause impotence. The anti-obestity drug, orlistat, came under fire for similar reasons. Critics said it fostered the misconception that modern ills can be dealt with by a pill instead of living a healthier life.Pharmaceuticals industryDrugsReproductionMedical researchSexual healthIan Sampleguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Darwin did get there before Wallace?
Alfred Venables, Julian Wimpenny and David Lloyd (Letters, December 3) suggest that Alfred Russel Wallace "has a stronger claim to the theory of evolution than has Darwin", and imply that there is something suspect in Charles Darwin's reaction to the 1858 letter from Wallace. This is contradicted by well-documented facts.The development of Darwin's thoughts on evolution can be traced in his notebooks of 1836-38, published in 1987 by Cornell University Press. These show that he had arrived at the theory of evolution by natural selection in 1838, fully 20 years before Wallace. In 1844 he wrote a detailed "sketch" of his ideas, which was communicated to Joseph Hooker. He had also discussed his ideas with Charles Lyell. He had intended to write a much larger work than The Origin of Species, but was stimulated by Wallace's letter into first publishing a short paper alongside Wallace's in 1858, and then into writing the Origin.He followed this up with many other major books, the ideas for which are also recorded in his notebooks. It is well known that others before Darwin and Wallace had proposed the idea of evolution, and of natural selection. Darwin's unique contribution was to marshal a wide range of evidence from the natural history of his time, supporting evolution as a historical process and natural selection as its main cause. Valuable as Wallace's contributions to biology were, there is no doubt that they are overshadowed by Darwin's range of insights into questions that the theory of natural selection could illuminate, and his mastery of the facts.Brian CharlesworthDeborah CharlesworthEdinburghCharles DarwinEvolutionguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
E.U. Leaders Play Catch-Up on Climate Strategy
The European Union is still figuring out its game plan for the United Nations climate summit meeting that began on Monday.
feeds.nytimes.com
The Doctor's World: For F.D.R. Sleuths, New Focus on an Odd Spot
A new book, “F.D.R.’s Deadly Secret,” revives an intriguing theory about a medical mystery around the 32nd president that persists to this day.
feeds.nytimes.com
Astronauts finally get Internet access in space
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) -- In a high tech first - really, really high - astronauts in space finally have Internet access....
hosted.ap.org