www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Webmaster 
Updated Thu, February 2, 2012.
101.www.astroarts.co.jp511000
102.www.oie.int507000
103.chandra.harvard.edu479000
104.www.inrp.fr472000
105.www.astrolab.ru469000
106.www.ias.ac.in468000
107.whc.unesco.org468000
108.www.chemieonline.de458000
109.www.vitisphere.com448000
110.www.scirus.com435000
111.www.gsi.de421000
112.www.idi.ntnu.no421000
113.www.deutsch-als-fremdsprache.de420000
114.www.ams.org414000
115.www.geo.de405000
116.www.technologyreview.com392000
117.www.ige.ch391000
118.www.cypress.com384000
119.www.astronomy.ru380000
120.mathworld.wolfram.com376000
121.www.wsl.ch376000
122.www.hausarbeiten.de375000
123.www.math.ntnu.no375000
124.www.bdtf.hu375000
125.www.123recht.net373000
126.www.textlog.de369000
127.www.mpe.mpg.de366000
128.www.ti.com362000
129.www.rankingsolar.com361000
130.www.livescience.com360000
131.www.plantphysiol.org360000
132.peccatte.karefil.com357000
133.saturn.jpl.nasa.gov356000
134.www.starlab.ru354000
135.www.fas.org352000
136.www.nhm.uio.no352000
137.www.sur-la-toile.com350000
138.www.ras.ru349000
139.babelfish.altavista.com348000
140.www.dtic.mil344000
141.www.astronet.ru344000
142.www.bfs.admin.ch338000
143.www.lyngsat.com333000
144.www.irem.univ-mrs.fr333000
145.www.dlr.de332000
146.www.popularmechanics.com331000
147.www.nims.go.jp331000
148.www.xilinx.com327000
149.www.les-mathematiques.net327000
150.www.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de326000
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Newsvine

146. www.popularmechanics.com

Rating: 331000 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.popularmechanics.com' on the other websites

www.popularmechanics.com

Popular Mechanics--Automotive, Technology, Home Journal, Outdoors and Science

Google

© 2005-2011 www.Top100Science.com
Clams befouling Tahoe invade Adirondack lake in NY
By MARY ESCH 2010-09-03T18:12:35ZBOLTON LANDING, N.Y. (AP) -- A thumbnail-sized clam blamed for clouding the azure bays of Lake Tahoe high in the Sierra Nevada has now turned up in a mountain-ringed Adirondack lake renowned for its limpid, spring-fed waters....
hosted.ap.org
China could make moon landing in 2025
Country also plans space station within a decade and Mars and Venus probes to be launched in next five yearsChina could put an astronaut on the moon in 2025 and launch probes to explore Mars and Venus within five years, according to the boss of a Chinese space programme.Ye Peijian said China could make its first manned moon landing in 15 years, send a probe to Mars by 2013 and to Venus by 2015."China has the full capacity to accomplish Mars exploration by 2013," he added.The remarks, by the commander in chief of the country's Chang'e lunar exploration project, were reported by the English language Global Times today and underscore the ambition of China's plans.It was understood that Ye was speaking in his capacity as an academic at an aerospace engineering forum at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, rather than unveiling official policy.It is seven years since China became only the third country to put one of its citizens in space. Another astronaut, Zhai Zhigang, conducted its first spacewalk in 2008.Yang Liwei, China's first spaceman, confirmed this weekend that the country planned to set up its first orbital space station by around 2020, according to the People's Daily website.Visiting the space centre in Xi'an, Yang said China would launch its first unmanned space laboratory, Tiangong-1, next year. It is expected to dock with the Shenzhou-8 craft in a first step towards building a space station."[The space programme] has been developing very quickly, but of course still lags far behind when compared with the US and Russia because they have the most advanced technology," Professor Fu Song, vice-dean of Tsinghua University's School of Aerospace in Beijing, told the Guardian.He said of the proposed moon landing: "It is obviously a very difficult task, but I think in terms of technology, China can do it – the US was technically able to do that almost half a century ago. So for China now it is more about whether the government will make the decision to do it, or whether it is really necessary for the country."He added: "The national pride part [of the programme] has always been one important reason, but it is more than that as well. The scientific value of space exploration is [im]measurable … The moon is an unknown world to us and there are a lot of things waiting to be explored."He said there could be energy resources still awaiting discovery, and that the moon could help in the study of the state of the Earth and universe before the dawn of humanity.Barack Obama has been criticised for dropping a plan to return Americans to the moon by 2020. Instead, the US president has announced an initiative aiming to see crewed missions beyond the moon by 2025.Although China and the US remain suspicious of each other's space plans, particularly since much of the technology could have military applications, they agreed last year to open a dialogue on space exploration.But China is also looking elsewhere for support. In late 2008, the Asia-Pacific Space Co-operation Organisation launched in Beijing.Additional research by Lin YiChinaSpaceThe moonEngineeringTania Braniganguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Prof Brian Foster on cuts in research funding
We do more with less than anybody else in the world, says Professor Brian Foster of Oxford University's physics departmentJessica Shepherd
guardian.co.uk
Today's Mystery Bird For You To Identify
This migratory bird has a large range throughout North America, Mexico, Europe and it even occupies a number of islands. It has a correspondingly large number of subspecies that vary on a regional basis. Can you tell me which one this is?Mystery Bird photographed in Fall City, Washington, USA. [I will identify this bird for you in 48 hours]Image: Jamie Samans, 10 September 2010 [with binoculars].Nikon D50 w/ an 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR lens.This migratory bird has a large range throughout North America, Mexico, Europe and it even occupies a number of islands. It has a correspondingly large number of subspecies that vary on a regional basis. Can you tell me which one this is? Daily Mystery Bird Rules: 1. Please name at least one field mark that supports your identification, keeping in mind that more than one field mark is often necessary to distinguish between species. IDs without any supporting information are not valid and may be deleted by the moderators. 2. Expert and intermediate level birders: do NOT try to be the first to blurt out the mystery bird's ID. Instead, please provide helpful hints, such as descriptions, literary references, puns, personal anecdotes, and other forms of discussion and assistance for beginning birders and for those following on their iPhones without naming the species. Expert and intermediate birders are free to name the bird species 24 or more hours after it was first published.3. Each mystery bird is usually accompanied by a question or two. These questions can be useful for identifying the pictured species, but may instead be used to illustrate an interesting aspect of avian biology, behaviour or evolution, or may be intended to generate conversation on other topics, such as conservation. 4. Each bird species will be demystified 48 hours after publication. If you have bird images, video or mp3 files that you'd like to share with a large and appreciate audience, feel free to email them to me for consideration.GrrlScientistguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Trees' ability to soak up CO2 has limits
The ability of forests to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere has been overrated, according to a new study by US and Australian scientists.
abc.net.au