www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Webmaster 
Updated Thu, February 2, 2012.
1.photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov166000000
2.www.freepatentsonline.com27900000
3.www.springerlink.com14600000
4.www.cnrs.fr11700000
5.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov10800000
6.www.biopix.dk10500000
7.ieeexplore.ieee.org8420000
8.www.nature.com8010000
9.repec.org7210000
10.www.nkj.ru4790000
11.www.jstor.org4660000
12.sc-smn.jst.go.jp4240000
13.www.sciencemag.org4040000
14.www.osti.gov3800000
15.www.sciencedirect.com3630000
16.www.elsevier.com3620000
17.www.biomedcentral.com2650000
18.www.care2.com2620000
19.www.ietf.org2410000
20.www.nejm.org2120000
21.www.degruyter.de1980000
22.www.perseus.tufts.edu1920000
23.www.psychologies.com1920000
24.www.techno-science.net1890000
25.www.cdc.gov1880000
26.www.timeanddate.com1800000
27.www.unilang.org1780000
28.www.goethe.de1750000
29.www.ssb.no1730000
30.arxiv.org1700000
31.www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp1700000
32.www.forskningsradet.no1660000
33.www.britannica.com1640000
34.cdsweb.cern.ch1550000
35.www.math.ku.dk1550000
36.www.sciencedaily.com1500000
37.www.mathworks.com1500000
38.scitation.aip.org1490000
39.jama.ama-assn.org1460000
40.www.science.uva.nl1460000
41.www.bls.gov1440000
42.www-sop.inria.fr1400000
43.www.newscientist.com1390000
44.www.pbs.org1380000
45.www.grin.com1330000
46.www.pnas.org1310000
47.www.uni-protokolle.de1280000
48.www.weizmann.ac.il1240000
49.www.epa.gov1230000
50.research.microsoft.com1220000
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Newsvine

15. www.sciencedirect.com

Rating: 3630000 points*
*amount mentions of word 'www.sciencedirect.com' on the other websites

www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect - Home

Google

© 2005-2011 www.Top100Science.com
Conducting Cable | Jon Butterworth
It is depressing is how soon after arriving in Whitehall ministers seem to pick up the traditional line on science fundingMinister: Ok, so I'm a bit new to this stuff. Why do we fund science?Usual suspect 1: Erm ... I always forget this bit.Usual suspect 2: It's an investment. It makes more money for the economy than it costs, by a huge factor. Plus the kids love it.Minister: Oh, right. Well, we need to make more money, don't we? Maybe we shouldn't cut it? In fact maybe we'll get out of this mess quicker if we spend a bit more money here?All: Fall about laughing.US1: Very droll minister. It is traditional to criticise scientists for not being entrepreneurs, then redirect research money into some innovation centres or something to subsidise industry. We could call them "campuses" or something.US2: I believe we used that already?US1: Ah. Well, then. We often point out that some of the science we fund is below the national average excellence.Minister: Oh well, we clearly should only fund excellence. It is inexcusable surely that we are funding anything that is below average?US2: Quite right minister. We should only fund the top half I would say. We should monitor it annually and if any of it is below the top half we should cut it.US1: Also, some research comes up with negative results. We shouldn't fund that stuff.Minister: Excellent, excellent. Well, that's a start. But I don't want to salami slice.US2: Indeed minister. We prefer to use this axe ...(To be repeated once every five years or so until the lights go out.)Science policyJon Butterworthguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
The Battle of the Bulbs
Three Republicans introduce a bill that would repeal impending standards for energy-efficient light bulbs.
feeds.nytimes.com
Neurofeedback Gains Popularity and Lab Attention
Practitioners say the procedure can address a host of neurological ills — among them attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, depression and anxiety. But some scientists denounce it.
feeds.nytimes.com
Dot Earth: Energy Action Amid Climate Discord
Conserving energy is seen as a smart choice even in places with few climate concerns.
feeds.nytimes.com
Is Bear Grylls 'afraid' of crocodiles?
SURVIVALISTS "nerves on edge" trekking through Northern territories 'croc infested' waters.
news.com.au