www.Top100Science.com - TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
TOP 100 SCIENCE SITES
 Main  |  Add a Site  |  FREE Content for Your Web-site  |  Bookmark this site  |  Webmaster 
Updated Thu, February 2, 2012.
301.www.csa.com146000
302.www.oiseaux.net145000
303.www.esri.com143000
304.www.deakin.edu.au142000
305.www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov142000
306.xroads.virginia.edu142000
307.www.gi-ev.de142000
308.volcano.und.nodak.edu141000
309.www.unu.edu141000
310.digitalarkivet.uib.no141000
311.www.nist.gov140000
312.hubblesite.org139000
313.www.spc.noaa.gov139000
314.www.rki.de139000
315.www.freetranslation.com138000
316.www.fnal.gov138000
317.www.flmnh.ufl.edu138000
318.stats.bls.gov137000
319.www.sintef.no137000
320.www.oeaw.ac.at137000
321.www.fis.unipr.it137000
322.www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de136000
323.‚¨¯—l‚ƃRƒ“ƒsƒ…[ƒ^...">star.gs136000
324.www.jlab.org135000
325.www.ids-mannheim.de135000
326.www.dokpro.uio.no134000
327.www.niehs.nih.gov133000
328.www.aps.org132000
329.www.gehealthcare.com132000
330.www.vde.com131000
331.www.buscagro.com131000
332.www.naturamediterraneo.com130000
333.www.wur.nl129000
334.www.astro.uio.no128000
335.www.imr.no128000
336.www.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de127000
337.www.iss.it127000
338.www.plos.org127000
339.www.dfg.de126000
340.www.cis.es126000
341.www.heavens-above.com125000
342.whale.wheelock.edu125000
343.www.ee.ethz.ch124000
344.www.msh-paris.fr124000
345.www.cesga.es124000
346.www.math.uu.se124000
347.www.extension.umn.edu123000
348.www.dsi.cnrs.fr123000
349.www.lifl.fr123000
350.herba.msu.ru122000
Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
 24  25  26  27 



Subscribe to RSS feed Subscribe to Feed Burner feed Add to Del.icio.us Add to Yahoo Add to Google Add to Reddit Add to Blink Add to Meneame Add to Fark Add to Newsvine

306. xroads.virginia.edu

Rating: 142000 points*
*amount mentions of word 'xroads.virginia.edu' on the other websites

xroads.virginia.edu

American Studies @ The University of Virginia

Google

© 2005-2011 www.Top100Science.com
Diabetes now tops Vietnam vets' claims
By MIKE BAKER 2010-08-30T18:12:52ZRALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- By his own reckoning, a Navy electrician spent just eight hours in Vietnam, during a layover on his flight back to the U.S. in 1966. He bought some cigarettes and snapped a few photos....
hosted.ap.org
Space junk: Earth's forgotten environmental disaster
Concerns about global warming have focused attention on the problems facing our planet, but there are also signs of environmental trouble in space.
abc.net.au
Florida panthers bound back thanks to Texas mates
By LAURAN NEERGAARD 2010-09-23T19:34:37ZWASHINGTON (AP) -- In the quest to save the endangered Florida panther, their Texas cousins were the cat's meow. Wildlife biologists moved eight female panthers from Texas - close relatives yet genetically distinct - into south Florida 15 years ago in hopes of boosting reproduction, and the immigration paid off....
hosted.ap.org
A genetic cause for ADHD won't necessarily reduce the stigma attached | Ben Goldacre
Scientists who believe that labelling mental health problems 'an illness' will reduce prejudice may find the opposite is trueWhat does it mean to say that a psychological or behavioural condition has a biological cause? Over the past week more battles have been raging over attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), after a paper published by a group of Cardiff researchers found evidence for a genetic association with the condition. Their study looked for chromosomal deletions and duplications known as copy number variants (CNV) and found that these were present in 16% of the children with ADHD.What many reports did not tell you – including the Guardian – is that this same pattern of CNV was also found in 8% of the children without ADHD. So that's not a massive difference.More interesting were the moral and cultural interpretations heaped on to this finding, not least by the authors themselves. "Now we can say with confidence that ADHD is a genetic disease and that the brains of children with this condition develop differently to those of other children," said Professor Anita Thapar. "We hope that these findings will help overcome the stigma associated with ADHD."Does the belief that such problems have a biological cause really help to reduce stigma?In 2001, Read and Harre explored attitudes among first-year undergraduate psychology students, with questionnaires designed to probe belief about the causes of mental health problems, and responses on six-point scales to statements such as: "I would be less likely to become romantically involved with someone if I knew they had spent time in a psychiatric hospital." People who believed more in a biological or genetic cause were more likely to believe that people with mental health problems were unpredictable and dangerous, more likely to fear them and more likely to avoid interacting with them. An earlier study in 1999 by Read and Law had similar results.In 2002 Walker and Read showed young adults a video portraying a man with psychotic symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, then gave them either biogenetic or psychosocial explanations. Yet again, the "medical model" approach significantly increased perceptions of dangerousness and unpredictability.In 2004 Dietrich and colleagues conducted a series of structured interviews with three representative population samples in Germany, Russia and Mongolia. Endorsing biological factors as the root cause for schizophrenia was associated with a greater desire for social distance.Lastly, more compelling than any individual study, a review of the literature to date in 2006 found that overall, biogenetic causal theories, and labelling something as an "illness", are both positively related to perceptions of dangerousness and unpredictability, and to fear and desire for social distance. They identified 19 studies addressing the question. Eighteen found that belief in a genetic or biological cause was associated with more negative attitudes to people with mental health problems. Just one found the opposite, that belief in a genetic or biological cause was associated with more positive attitudes.These findings are at odds with everything that many people who campaign against stigma have assumed for many years, but they're not entirely nonsensical. Jo Phelan, in her paper "Genetic bases of mental illness – a cure for stigma?", said that a story about genetic causes may lead to people being conceived of as "defective" or "physically distinct". It can create an associative stigma for the whole family, who in turn receive labels such as "at risk" or "carrier". This stigma may persist long after ADHD symptoms have receded in adulthood: perhaps a partner will wonder: "Do I really want to risk having a child with this person, given their genetic predisposition?"Perhaps it will go further than that: your children, before they even begin to show any signs of inattentiveness or hyperactivity, will experience a kind of anticipatory stigma. Do they have this condition, just like their father? "It's genetic you know." Perhaps the threshold for attaining a diagnosis of ADHD will be lower for your children: it's a condition, like many others, with a notably flexible diagnostic boundary.Blaming parents is vile. But before reading this research I think I also assumed, unthinkingly, like many people, that a "biological cause" story about mental health problems was inherently valuable for combating stigma. Now I'm not so sure. People who want to combat prejudice may need to challenge their own prejudices, too.I'll be speaking at today's protest against science cuts, 2pm outside the Treasury. See scienceisvital.org.uk/Attention deficit hyperactivity disorderMental healthPsychologyHealthGeneticsBiologyBen Goldacreguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds
guardian.co.uk
Future farm
Local community divided over plans for US-style mega dairy
bbc.co.uk